Sunday, September 27, 2009

In Defense of Television

It's that time of year. When the leaves are changing, apples are ripe, and all of the networks compete for viewers with TV shows new and old. And I'll be one of those viewers. I love television. No matter what anyone else says, I believe it has value. And it turns out I'm not the only one.

I have a handful of friends who "don't watch television," and I certainly respect their preference not to. There's plenty of nonsense on there for sure, and I think it's totally reasonable when someone prefers to spend his/her time doing things besides staring at magic pictures in a box. However, I do feel frustrated when people disparage television on the whole or consider the fact that they don't watch television a point of pride rather than just a simple choice of hobby. (To me it's like saying, "Oh, I don't do needlepoint." Who cares?) Awhile back, a news article discussing CBS's choice to edit a racist rant out of Big Brother was followed by reader comments about the general worthlessness of television. (I quietly wondered how many of them regularly check LOLCats for updates before perusing their friends' Facebook pages and watching videos on YouTube.) But the funny part is that their rants actually just reinforced one of the major benefits of television: it can serve as a starting point for very useful conversations. In this particular case, it started a conversation about race and free speech.

The "boob tube" of late is anything but. Sure, there's still plenty of garbage on television, but there is also a lot of wonderful programming. We are fans of numerous shows these days, including Lost, Mad Men, House, History Detectives, Nova, and 30 Rock. I must admit we have never been fans of reality television, mostly because I just don't have the stomach for the drama and bickering that comes with it. But I'm willing to consent that some of those shows may have value as well. I'm just not personally aware of it.

I like television for many reasons. Perhaps the best one is that it can provide common ground where otherwise there might be none. Shows like Lost, for instance, carry a devoted group of followers that will discuss the details of an episode ad nauseam, often building positive feelings about those with whom they share this interest. Particularly entertaining Saturday Night Live skits are discussed at work and school and emailed around to friends and family. Coverage of major sporting events helps build a sense of community (and a sense of enmity, to be fair), like when most of America became enamored with Shaun White during the 2006 Winter Olympics. Along those lines, television also provides a good starting point for conversations, both lighthearted and serious. Episodes of Mad Men frequently incite long discussions in our household about what it meant to be female in the 1960s, what a marriage should be, and how to raise children, never mind which cocktails we like best. Shows like 30 Rock and The Simpsons provide social and political commentary that can raise awareness of current issues and spark discussion, not to mention make us laugh. Television also inspires creativity through programming that deals with food, fashion, home improvement, etc. The Food Network is responsible for a number of new dishes in our household, for instance. Along these lines, television also gives people access to information they might not otherwise have had. (I admit sometimes this is a bad thing, particularly when people get their "facts" from some of those "news" programs out there. Personally, we prefer to get our news from the Colbert Report.) When put in the hands of intelligent, thoughtful people, television can be a wonderful thing. Will we let our children watch it? You bet.

Honestly, though, for us television provides one thing that we value above all of this other stuff: much needed escape. We look forward to laughing at Tina Fey and Alec Baldwin each week. We like the suspense and heated debate that comes at the conclusion of each episode of Lost. And oddly enough, we even enjoy that slightly frustrated, empty feeling we get at the conclusion of each episode of Mad Men. Whereas some might proudly proclaim some superhuman resistance to the power of television, we proudly proclaim our allegiance. Sure, we can and have lived without it, but we prefer not to.

9 comments:

CinnamonOpus said...

We don't have television. There's not enough good on to justify the expense. (Also, we are TV snobs. We admit it.)

But we have a massive DVD collection, and we will buy series on DVD. And we watch DVDs over and over again.

Will our daughter watch TV? No. But she is welcome to stream videos from Sesame Street online, or whatever other websites we find for her, or watch whatever videos we currently have in kiddie circulation.

Xander and Alana Cole-Faber said...

Ahem. CO? Whether online or on DVD or on the actual digital signal, what you (and your daughter) are watching is called television. Confess! Confess! Confess! You like it, too!

We do "have television," but we take advantage of those other mediums as well. Especially for Mad Men, which is not available via the old cable method where we live. We may consider doing it all online when we move back to the states, but we can't get a lot of the stuff we like online here without paying extra. So it's cheaper just to have the cable. We also got some deal when we signed up for phone service (we don't have cell phones), so that's mainly why we ended up with it. I love it, though. It's true.

Xander and Alana Cole-Faber said...

I guess I feel compelled to add that we're not those people who turn the television on in the morning and leave it on until we go to bed, nor would we want our kids to do that. This is one of those things that goes without saying for people who actually know us. (We read books and such, too!)

CinnamonOpus said...

No, I won't confess, I won't! And you can't make me! *grin*

I will admit to watching carefully selected programs. I am a fan of some television as a production medium -- the story arc of a series of X shows from start to finish, in short increments. Or the capability of a good series to engage me in quality stories, or acting, or information, for a set period of time, changing week to week.

I guess, when I think of television, I think of the whole package -- including commercials, news, specialty programming, reality television, the whole shooting match -- and of that I am NOT a fan. I believe there is far too much shit to sift through to find the pearls. And I believe that it is largely designed to pander to the lowest common denominator. If the medium is the message, the message has become degraded and sold cheap in recent years.

Xander and Alana Cole-Faber said...

Whatever. You are soooo busted. I'm telling everyone. CO watches television!!! Like a regular person!!! You hear me, world?!

CinnamonOpus said...

Oh SURE. Rat me out to the entire world. Some friend YOU ARE.

I was going to lend you some of my DVDs but now? No DVDs for YOU!

*flounces away in huff*

Skyebyrd said...

I can't really say that I'm a TV snob, because I will watch DVDs of certain series. And I veg with the best of them when at my Dad's. For me, it's just not worth the expense, of money or time that I could be spending doing something constructive. If I had TV, I know I would watch other people do creative things instead of doing them myself! But, I'm also just really cheap! I don't have a home phone, internet, cable/dish/whatever-it's-called, and my company pays my cell phone.

Xander and Alana Cole-Faber said...

Yes, but it's just a personal choice. It's not really fair to call TV generally not constructive. You may not do constructive things when you have access to television, but that's a personal thing. I do have television, and I would say I do a lot of constructive things. I don't find that having cable access keeps me from doing other things at all now, or even when I was at work all day. I crochet, I read, I write, I can, I cook almost all of our meals, I bake almost all of our bread. And I watch television. And I find that particular creative medium enhances my life.

In terms of wasteful expenses, I think that also comes down to personal choice. I don't think spending money on television is any more wasteful than some of the other ways people spend money. Sure, I spend money on television, but I don't have car or a house or a cell phone or a lot of kitchen gadgets. I don't buy a lot of CDs or DVDs. I don't buy much processed food. We buy used furniture, clothes, and books or pick them up free when we can.

Anyway, what I'm saying is that it's fine with me if people want to spend money and time on other things. I don't think everyone should watch television or anything like that. But I do think the fact that some people don't watch television doesn't make them somehow smarter or better or less wasteful or more productive than anyone else.

I also think people who don't watch television, or at least who don't watch it thoughtfully, cannot really make the claim that it has no value. One would need to watch television to make such an argument.

Xander and Alana Cole-Faber said...

If you listen to podcasts, that first link might be of interest. It's a very thoughtful discussion about the moral and religious lessons and parallels one might find in television. It's actually what got me thinking about television and how it fits into my life. It's a program called Speaking of Faith, and they also did a really nice podcast on food. Anyway, here's a blurb and a link:

Diane Winston appreciates good television, studies it, and brings many of its creators into her religion and media classes at the University of Southern California. In what some have called a renaissance in television drama, we examine how TV is helping us tell our story and work through great confusions in contemporary life.

http://speakingoffaith.publicradio.org/programs/2009/tv/